Discussion Week 1 Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Discussion Week 1 - Assignment Example It implies that, in regards to the earning status of the numerator at the same time as the earnings status in the numerator also when depressing the terms of shareholders equity status in the denominator can be boosted when calculating the return on equity ratio artificially. The cash return on an actual equity is actually the consequential figure (Condon, 1999). The accounts analyst relies on guidance from companies to outline their forecasts which guides to a lower number. The price of missing quarter can go up sharply from an exceptional interplay, among the stocks which are highly priced. Fox (1997) further state that, if you don’t have an extra penny to keep Wall Street happy, as a result your company will be at stake since it will send your stock to reduce, saving the those earnings for next quarter is better than missing a dime or two. This concept is of significance to the companies. As the companies play the earning game they are able to anticipate whether the revenue will fail. Conversely, in case of any prospects that are on a quarter of a particular stated stock, best businesses will ultimately see the mainly equity value approval. Mutually, companies should not much care about the earnings of a given quarter, since profit from the markets behaviors to both earnings drop and hits is what they seek every day. Further, companies in play, when the stock price immensely goes down compared to its basic value, there are chances of going out or private. Thus a company deserves to be valued accordingly based on its own future financial cash flow (Nelson, 2011). Condon, B. (1999).Creative Accounting. Retrieved on 19th Aug 2014 from: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:iE18IruxKaIJ:www.oocities.org/wallstreet/district/9390/links3.htm+&cd=10&hl=en&ct=clnk&client=firefox-a Fox, J. (1997). Learn to play the earnings game (and Wall Street will love you) the pressure to report smooth, ever higher earnings

The Individual Versus Society in Kerouac and Ginsberg Essay -- Allen G

The Individual Versus Society in Kerouac and Ginsberg    One theme that is prevalent throughout much of the literature we have covered so far is that it is very critical of the conformist values of late 1950s society. In an era of Levittowns and supermarkets and the omnipresent television, there was a call to leave the conformist suburban culture in search of something higher. Two major proponents of the individual as opposed to society were Jack Kerouac and Allen Ginsberg, two of the central figures in the Beat movement. Through their work one can gain a perspective on the anti-conformity spirit that was brewing under the surface in the Beat culture. The Dharma Bums, by Jack Kerouac, tells us through the mouth of Ray Smith about his time with Japhy the Zen Lunatic. His narrative depicts a critique of modern culture, with its demands, expectations, and plastic rewards. Even the title of the book suggests this, as the Buddhist word Dharma means one's niche, or spiritual duty in the universe. Thus a Dharma Bum would be one whose natural place in the world, where he rightly belongs, is living the life of a transient. In other words, Kerouac is saying that there is no shame in a life which is outside of the normal realm of society, if this is where one's life takes them. One central theme of The Dharma Bums is Buddhism. One of the most important things to note about the religion in this book is the two forms it takes, and the significance these forms have on the plot and meaning of the book. Ray Smith is a neophyte in the school of Theraveda Buddhism, which is a school dedicated to movement towards enlightenment. Under the teaching of the Theraveda canon, everything a person does should be done with the end goal of perso... ...the top of the mountain and climbing still higher. However, Ginsberg sees desolation and the decay of our society into a homogenous, conformist slop. The reason for this difference could be attributed to their particular situations; while both were climbing higher and higher both in the Beat circles and in the literary world, Ginsberg was still confronting his own sexuality and past. At any rate, however, it becomes clear through the readings of these poets that both were proponents of the individual, and that both condemned conformity. By the late 1950s, the main question on the minds of these men would be whether we could rise above the "faceless wonderless crapulous civilization." Works Cited Allen, Donald, ed. The New American Poetry 1945-1960. Berkely, CA.: U. of California P., 1999. Kerouac, Jack. The Dharma Bums. New York: The Penguin Group, 1976.

Freedom of Thought in Fahrenheit 451 Essay

Freedom of thought is taken for granted in today’s society, but in Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451, society works differently. This freedom, or lack thereof, is not recognized until fireman, Guy Montag, proves to himself that thoughts are important. Through a maze of censorship and curiosity, Montag faces his government because of his interest in books. This book shows that everybody should have the right to think freely because it eases curiosity, promotes creativity and imagination, and encourages beliefs. Curiosity can become an obsession if it is not controlled. Montag becomes a puppet of his own curiosity, and as a result, he faces consequences unexpected by himself or anybody around him. Beatty, the cruel fire chief, even knows that â€Å"every fireman, sooner or later hits this,† or becomes curious about books (Bradbury 83). Even when Montag realizes that his inquiry can hurt his wife, Millie, he still continues to search for answers because he believes it to be the right thing to do for himself and the best thing for his city. His downfall directly affects everybody close to him. All people should have the right to be curious, but if thoughts were not controlled there would be fewer relationship problems and less confusion. Another reason freedom of thought is important is that it promotes creativity and imagination. This unique individuality is what makes a person who they are and what role they play in society. The people in society are much like books, so books are a symbol of people. A book has qualities that makes it different just as a person is made different by their own individuality. Therefore, â€Å"there must be something in books [people], things we can’t imagine† that makes an individual their own person (Bradbury 81). Imagination and free thought go hand in hand in similarity. This imagination, or free thought, is creativity; therefore, freedom of thought is important to individuality and society. In one case, Bradbury speaks of a woman who â€Å"spoils the ritual† and defies the law and is burnt with her books as if she were a martyr (Bradbury 66). This shows that the woman believed that books were okay and freedom of thought should be free. The woman’s belief cause governmental punishment that only pushed her to stand even more firm on what she believed. Also, beliefs create similarities in people who help them to genuinely relate to one another in authoritative situations and in general life. Some of these relations form friendships, and friendships form a web of peace in society and work places. For this reason, thoughts and beliefs are important in society to help maintain healthy relations and authority rolls. In today’s society, people can crush one’s freedom of thought by prohibiting it and discarding its importance. It is important to maintain a culture of free thought so that everybody can experience equality. Fahrenheit 451 is relevant to equality and freedom of thought because it shows Montag’s journey to promote these freedoms. When Montag overcomes his society and moves into the natural world he realizes just how important his thoughts are. In many ways, Montag is an example of the power of free thought and its effects of society. According to these facts, it is logical for all people to be able to have a right to free thought and the ability to develop themselves with the power of thoughts.

Julius Caesar Flaws Analysis - 732 Words

In William Shakespeares Julius Caesar there were many people that had major faults that hurt them but also so helped them in some cases. For example; Antony, Cassius, Brutus, and even Caesar himself. in that day in age patriotism was a noble thing and as many people stated Brutus was a noble man. Brutus didnt believe Caesar should have been in power and that Caesar was overly ambitious and that his ambition would cause problems for the kingdom. When Caesar first became the ruler Cassius and Brutus werent very approving. They tried to make the citizens stop celebrating the death of Pompey, because the citizens loved and adored him while he was their ruler. Then Caesar killed him, and everyone started to praise and adore Caesar†¦show more content†¦So if Caesar is feeble tempered he gets mad easily and thats not a good trait in a ruler. A ruler is someone who needs too be patient and hear people out not just act out of feelings, and people who are hot tempered normally act o ff of their emotions. Caesar also shows his inability to rule when he wont listen to his wife. His wife told him that she never believed in omens but dhe had a dream of him dying and it scared her and they pulled the guts out of the sacrificed animal and couldnt find its heart. Caesars response to that was â€Å"cowards die many time before their deaths. The valiant never taste of death but once. Of all the wonders that i yet have heard, it seems to me most strange that men should fear, seeing that death, a necessary end, will come when it will come.† So off he went then he ended up getting killed. If he cant even listen to his wife then how is he going to make advice from his council? You cant rule without an adviser or someone to help you make decisions or it would be considered a dictatorship, and dictatorship hasnt worked well in the past. Take Benito Mussolini, Italy (1883-1945), his religion was so bad that he was summarily executed by communist. His body was hung upsi de down and pummeled with rock. Brutus,Cassius, and all the other conspirators were only looking out for the people of Rome. They may have loved Caesar but the werent going to let their personal feelings get in the way ofShow MoreRelatedEssay about Julius Caesar: Superstition, Sacrifice, Suffering and Sorrow1032 Words   |  5 Pages(The Roman Empire). In the play Julius Caesar, the author William Shakespeare uses superstition repeatedly to affect the plot as well as the characters. Superstition in the play is used to foreshadow Caesar’s death, impact Brutus’ actions in the battlefield and to emphasize the Roman’s connection to superstition and fate. One of the biggest superstitious beliefs in Rome at that time was the power to see the future; which Caesar’s future was to die. Julius Caesar was one of Rome’s greatest leadersRead More Julius Caesar as a Tragic HEro Essay1485 Words   |  6 Pages Julius Caesar as a Tragic Hero nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The Ides of March mean much more than March 15th, it was also the day Julius Caesar, the Roman general and leader was killed. Although this day is not a holiday, we should take time to think of things Caesar didn’t on this fateful day. In â€Å"Julius Caesar,† by William Shakespeare, Caesar that morning solidified his place as a tragic hero because of his tremendous fatal flaw. Aristotle once defined the tragic hero as a person of noble orRead MoreAnalysis Of Gaius Suetonius TranquitusDe Vita Caesartus1510 Words   |  7 Pagesand also for his book ‘The Twelve Caesars’ which essentially changed the way in which history was written. For many, they believe that Suetonius’ ‘De Vita Caesarum established a new framework, an original genre of historical biography unseen before which consequently made a significant contribution to historical scholarship. This review will look in particular at the aspects of Suetonius’ style of writing seen in the first chapter, which focuses on Julius Caesar, and also how specific writing techniquesRead MoreWilliam Shakespeares Julius Caesar - Mark Antony Proves to Be the Most Skilful Politician in the Play. Do You Agree?1238 Words   |  5 PagesWilliam Shakepeares Julius Caesar Mark Antony proves to be the most skilful politician in the play. Do you agree? Power is the ability to influence the behaviour of others - whether this is achieved with or without resistance, for good or for bad. Some would go as far as to say that all human behaviour is propelled by the want of power. One can conclude, however, that power is inevitable in the human society. It’s natural. William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, is brimming with humansRead MoreAnalysis of Caius Cassius Character1418 Words   |  6 PagesAnalysis of Caius Cassius Character Caius Cassius plays one of the most important roles in William Shakespeare’s play, â€Å"Julius Caesar†, which is centred round the assassination of the Roman dictator. The driving force behind the conspiracy is Cassius though there are others who are unhappy with the state of affairs under the prevailing system. Yet, they do not take an active part in the design to get rid of powerful Caesar. So, it is not incorrect to state that the chief protagonist of the assassinationRead MoreEssay about Information and the CIA Triad1319 Words   |  6 Pagesanalytical and Factual information. Security is defined as the prevention of intentional harm. The CIA Triad is structure of policies relating to solving problems dealing with information security. Julius Caesar was the first to create something that could be considered as information security. He invented the Caesar cipher. Unless you were meant to see his messages, it was totally undecipherable. There are two categories with in information systems: IT security and information assurance. IT security is mainlyRead MoreHow Caesar s Political Career1836 Words   |  8 Pagescoup. Julius Caesar, a nephew of Marius, descended from a noble family who were ardent supporters of the populares. Like Sulla, Caesar was greatly renowned as an exceptionally competent military commander, conquering Gaul. Remarkably, Caesar was also central to a series of civil wars between his former political allies, Crassus and Pompey, and claimed victory in this conflict just like Sulla – by defiantly marching an army on Rome and establishing himself as dictator. While Sulla and Caesar wereRead MoreThe Functions and History of the Roman Senate Essay1388 Words   |  6 Pagesbetween governments of the ancient world and our modern day governments. In other words, the past generally denotes monarchy, empire, or absolute control. While modern government usually implies republic, voting, or democratic control. However, an analysis of Roman government reveals that it does not exactly fit purely into either mold of government. It was a mixture of many elements, democratic, monarchial, and aristocratic. The purpose of this report will be to provide a general overview of theRead MoreGraduation Speech - Original Writing1607 Words   |  7 PagesKing of Kings. What an intriguing pseudonym and title I used for this one†¦ foreshadowing for Poetry Out Loud? In all seriousness, this essay was a mess. Achingly, it has incredible potential. As you said on Canvas, each paragraph needs additional analysis to be great. I didn’t even manage to write a hook, the quotes are atrociously integrated, and the transitions are cringeworthy. I can see the value in learning to write essays in contained time periods, but I much prefer to let thoughts stir in myRead MoreEmpire Notes3812 Words   |  16 Pagesthat he would have not only in politics but also in the 20th Century * In the end, not even Churchill could save the British Empire as within his lifetime, the Empire unravelled * Why was Churchill able to predict these changes? * Saw the flaws in the Empire, even at its height * Lines had been drawn and alliances made – start of the battle as the ‘spheres of influence’ had already been decided * People had alliances and enemies – this was a very different world to the one in which